Back to Work

Quantum

Design of an enterprise manufacturing data analytics tool — enabling efficient, feature-based data exploration with centralized specifications at Google.

Role

UX Designer

Year

2021

Platform

Web (Desktop)

Teams

Program Management, UX Design, UX Research, Frontend Engineering, Google Material Design

Overview

Huge volumes of complex manufacturing data are generated during mass production of Google hardware products. Teams needed to explore and understand patterns in this data, but faced challenges around data inconsistencies, inefficient access modes, and security barriers — leading to heavy reliance on scattered Google Sheets and visualization tools with too many dropdown filters.

Background — team and project context

The Problem

Problem overview

Research Insights

Our research with program managers and test engineers surfaced three key issues.

User insights from interviews

Lack of consistent data specifications. Cross-functional teams used different tools with different data definitions, leading to conflicting scenarios during reporting.

Data-intensive views aren’t always preferred. Senior executives and product managers wanted glanceable content with top issues and yield trends — not complex, data-busy visualizations.

Fragmented experience for feature-based queries. Users framed questions using “if…else” connectors, but answering these required numerous filters — an inefficient and difficult process.

Personas

Personas representing our core user types across the manufacturing data workflow.

Personas

How Might We

How might we design for efficient feature-based insight exploration with centralized data specification and support glanceable experience alongside data-intensive dashboard?

How Might We framing

Critical User Journeys

We mapped three core user journeys connecting users with their deeper goals.

Critical User Journeys

User journey map

Concept Generation

Within a group of all stakeholder representatives — test engineers, PMs, executives, vendor teams — we generated concepts, voted on them, and prioritized using an Impact vs. Effort matrix.

Concept A

Wireframes — Concept A

Concept B

Wireframes — Concept B

Concept C

Wireframes — Concept C

Prototyping & Design Iterations

Progressive Content Disclosure

Finding the right balance between engineering-centric views and glanceable insight views.

Top Insights — comparing concepts

Relative Data Visualization

Moving away from conventional charts to explore more effective ways to represent relative aspects of data.

Visualizations — comparing concepts

Multi-Dimensional Data Insights

Facilitating efficient analysis of multi-dimensional data — evaluating tree view vs. icicle diagram approaches.

Multi-dimensional insights

Accessibility

Validating with a11y recommendations for voice-over, contrast ratio checks, and vision tests.

Accessibility testing

The Solution

Top Insights View

Leveraging ML to synthesize high-level, glanceable insights that deliver the most value to users

Feature-based Exploration

An intuitive, conversational approach to explore data insights — minimizing complex query filters

Centralized Data Specs

A single specification across cross-functional teams for consistent analysis and projections

Top Insights

Top Insights view

Feature-based Data Exploration

Centralized Data Specifications

Impact

+18%

Increase in daily yield (units produced) overall

+72%

Increment in page visits per week after launch — adopted by other cross-functional teams

1.5 hrs saved

Average time saved for test engineers troubleshooting station issues

-24%

Reduction in product returns from customers to Failure Analysis